er, doubt. By the way, I am not sure whether Bush lied, or was lied to, or just doesn't give a damn. I do agree with you that anyway you look at it though, he is responsible.
Dana On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:05:05 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah but I bout bush subscribes to this list > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:48:08 -0600, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sam's not the one who needs to say something about this news report.....the > > president is. > > > > I want a direct explanation. I don't need an apology....but I want a direct > > answer. I'm sick of this dodge of "revealing our intell will risk future > > operations". Bullshit. > > > > Besides, if your "future operations" are borne of the same tenets that > > constructed the current set of "intelligence"....god help us. > > > > > > > Last time I used his name in vain he popped up out of lurkdom and told > > > me I had an attitude. Maybe you're right though, he sure has not had > > > anything to say today. On the other hand, would you? > > > > > > Dana > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:142357 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
