that was what I was wondering.... if the women are you know tweaking each other's body parts or what... if not, aren't we reading a whole heck of a lot into the fact that two women share a house? It happens on a platonic basis all the time.
Dana On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:04:12 -0500, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the article about this issue in this morning's Washington > Post, the most that is mentioned is that one of the kids introduces > one of the women as her step-mom and that she loves her a lot. > > no mention of homosexuality at all in the TV show. > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A40188-2005Jan26?language=printer > > Given the reactions by conservatives, you know its not all that far > from the pink triangles and the death camps of the nazis. > > larry > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:44:40 -0600, Deanna Schneider > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you ever seen an episode? Basically, this animated bunny goes and > > talks to real people and learns about their lives - usually involving > > some fun adventure. It's shot on "video" from his perspective - so > > that you usually don't see Buster, but just hear his voice. The last > > episode I saw, he goes to a trailer park, where a single white mom is > > raising 5 black kids in a trailer (though at one point they mention 9 > > people living in the trailer). Buster hangs in out in their bedroom, > > where all 5 kids (boys and girls) sleep. These are real kids, living > > real lives. Oh my god! Poverty! Shield the children! > > > > Poverty is never mentioned, by the way. My guess is that in the Sugar > > time episode, homosexuality is never mentioned. These are just real > > kids, real families. Last time I checked, there are real lesbian > > families out there. > > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:30:15 -0500, David Churvis > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Okay... > > > > > > If the program centers around learning about maple sugar processing, why > > > does there have to be a lesbian couple? I'm siding with the Secretary of > > > Education on this one - there was just no reason for it, and in all > > > honesty, > > > most taxpayers don't want their kids exposed to homosexuality at an early > > > age. > > > > > > Dave > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Deanna Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:20 AM > > > Subject: Welcome the New Education Secretary (Add Buster to the List) > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cnn.com/2005/EDUCATION/01/26/education.secretary.pbs.ap/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:144842 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
