Equality to choose your own lifestyle. Of course. No one should be robbed of that right.
And perhaps in a long term financial(and committed) and emotional relationship, I would push the envelop further than stopping with "gay relationships" and push it as far as the other relations I mentioned. 2 sisters, living together for years, sharing in all financial aspects, just as a married couple would. Yves On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:28:38 -0400, Yves Arsenault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I didn't get this post before I answered. > > Well, I think that in this debate, we should look at everything. > > The results and biological functions of both relations are different. > > That is pretty much what I said. > > But, in this debate. It doesn't seem to be taken into consideration. > > It has been spun into "religion" VS "equality". While we must both > admit that "equality" here may not be the correct term. Because, > biology itself shows their difference. > > And once again, I'm not saying anyone should do or not do anything. > That is and should be up to one's conscience. > > Yves > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:01:56 -0600, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW, Yves, I meant this as it's fine for you to have an opinion on it > > also. I'll respect your opinion even, but as soon as you want the > > gov't to classify it as something different, you're saying that you > > want your beliefs foremost. > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:59:48 -0600, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Okay, I'll bite. What other "classifications" should we come up with? > > > My friends have tried invitro several times and even though they get > > > pregnant, her body rejects the pregnancy, so therefore it doesn't seem > > > like they will ever birth a child. What should there's be called, > > > "Married-Barren"? What about people for whom adoption is their first > > > choice, "Married-Wannabees"? Interracial marriages? Oh yea, they need > > > their own labels too! Hmm..I could really piss a bunch a people off > > > with that one. While were at it, why don't we rename heterosexual > > > same race marriages as "Married-Proper", because afterall, once we > > > start classifying them, we need to make sure there's a hierarchy of > > > the most desireable types. > > > > > > Ok, my rant's done now. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:39:32 -0400, Yves Arsenault > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > One thing about gay marriage..... > > > > > > > > This is just my 2 cents... > > > > > > > > In my opinion it should be "classified" differently than traditional. > > > > > > > > The human rights issue is only speaking about one's right to choose. > > > > Yes, everyone has the right to make their own choices whatever they > > > > might be. > > > > > > > > But, one relationship is pro-creative and supports the continued human > > > > existence, while the other cannot. They must be distinguished. All > > > > emotionalism aside, that is reality. Anyone who voices a disagreement > > > > with the whole gay marriage thing are almost immediatly branded as > > > > "intolerant", while it is factual that there are both "good" people > > > > and "intolerant" people on both sides of the debate. > > > > > > > -- > > G-mail must not realize I'm and anti-social nerd, it keeps telling me > > to "Invite 8 friends to Gmail" > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Studio MX with Flash Pro from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=51 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148183 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
