> -----Original Message----- > From: Yves Arsenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 2:30 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Gay Marriage( Was: Re: Activist Judges) > > Excuse me Jim.... > > But diabetics and non-diabetics... (a bit off track)
Why? The dietary and health needs of committed partners must play as large (if not a larger) role in a relationship than sexual needs. > Does sex play a part in marriage? > > Once again, relational contract.. it doesn't matter. > > If a biological importance falls in marriage, then it does. Then so would general health and well-being issues, no? It's also very likely that health issues would eliminate the possibility of procreation or even of any sort of sex for many couples, shouldn't that make them doubly inclusive within your standard? Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148247 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
