Excuse me Jim.... But diabetics and non-diabetics... (a bit off track)
Does sex play a part in marriage? Once again, relational contract.. it doesn't matter. If a biological importance falls in marriage, then it does. Yves On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:13:36 -0500, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 1:06 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Gay Marriage( Was: Re: Activist Judges) > > > > Yves Arsenault > > > The results or functioning in the sexual act in the human man and > > > human female are different than the act in 2 human males or 2 human > > > females. > > > > But why is that so relevant for the subject of marriage that they *must* > > be distinguished? > > And why is that so relevant but so many other things are not? Should > marriages between diabetics and non-diabetics be distinguished differently? > Should marriages in which sex does not occur be? Should interracial > marriages carry a special label? > > Financial matters play as large (if not a larger) role socially as sexual > matters in marriage and a far, far more important role governmentally (in > which sexual matters do not play a role). Should we then have categories > based on that as well? Should my marriage be labeled differently because I > am the sole income generator yet my wife handles all of the money? > > Why single out this one, governmentally meaningless, aspect and not others? > > Jim Davis > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148227 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
