Let me get this straight, if there's not enough negative news about Bush than the whole system is corrupt?
Sounds like you are suffering from GG syndrome: "It's getting to the point that many Americans I talk to don't want to think openly - they develop a world view, find a commentary source descibes global events through that lens, and then refuse to hear anything else." Maybe the major media got caught making up stuff about Bush and had to stop. Dan Rather ring a bell? On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 17:32:04 -0600, Dana wrote: > I also agree that actual impartial journalism is next to non-existent > anymore and where it does it is perverted. For instance, reporting > that President Bush says x y or z is objectively true especially if he > statement is alro released as a transcript. But what if what the > president says is not true or is misleading? More and more it seems > that this is addressed only in analysis that appear only on the oped > pages or buried deep in the news sections of the better papers. I > think that part of this is that news organizations are afraid of > losing access to press briefings so they confine themselves to the > strictly true "so and so today said" type of reporting. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Flash for programmers - Flash MX Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=56 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:149763 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
