That's an awfully presumptuous statement. Is it not possible for two parties to have completely different ideas of what 'looking out for Terri' entails? It seems that because his view of what is right for Terri doesn't line up with your view, he is obviously in it for the wrong reasons. I tend to believe both parties want that is best for Terri, they just don't agree what that is. Turning down $1 million (and possible $10 million) is evidence that he is not in it for the money. There is no evidence at this point to suggest he is in it for the money however unless you count his views not lining up with yours evidence.
( In the spirit of full disclosure, I think they should let the poor woman die, however I don't begrudge the parents for disagreeing) Dana wrote: >It would mean more to me, but then I would never be where he is so >that is probably meaningless. I don't know that he is in it for the >money; I just don't think he is trying to look out for Terri. Money is >merely one possible alternate explanation. > >Dana > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:150494 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
