> Dana wrote: > Personally I think that you can approach this case on a number of > levels -- legal, medical, ethical, emotional, and maybe some more that > don't come to mind right now.
Yes, you view this as an issue the public should review from all sorts of angles rather than a private medical issue between the Schiavos, their doctors, and their god. In this case the family disagrees on how to proceed, if they didn't we wouldn't be discussing it. That means the ONLY question for us to answer is: in the case that a family disagrees on a private medical issue who has the final say? I like the current arrangement with first the spouse, next the adult children, and third the parents. Your position (and Sam's) is that the federal government should get a decision above all three of those groups and your hope is they would make the call you favor. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151347 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
