Given that very few have any idea of what is involved, her account sounds more like wishful thinking more than anything else.
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:04:47 -0800, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another nurse comes forward. > > I know Larry, they're stupid nurses and are not qualified to determine > if she really ate or spoke. > > http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,151140,00.html > > Carla Sauer Iyer (search), a registered nurse who provided care to > Terri Schiavo from 1995 to 1996 at a convalescence home in Largo, > Fla., told FOX News in an interview Tuesday that her patient would > interact with staff, was alert and aware and could talk. > > "Her cognitive abilities including laughing, talking, letting you know > she was in pain," Iyer told FOX News, adding that Terri Schiavo could > say words like "mommy," "help me," "hi" and "pain." > > She also said Schiavo had accurate reflexes on demand. Nurses also > were able, at times, to feed Terri thickened liquids such as pudding > and Jello with a baby bottle. > > Iyer also claims that one time when she put a washcloth in Terri's > hand to test her reflexes, Michael Schiavo would get upset and say, > "that's therapy â€" take that washcloth out." > > "I think a gag order has been put on all positive things that Terri > has done," claimed Iyer. > > Iyer said she was coming forward "to let the truth be known, to let > the people know. I was one of the few people who was able to see > Terri. She was able to talk, communicate with staff ... I want the > public to know the truth." > > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:53:12 -0600, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > negative. But it's not my criterion, it's yours. Except that you don't > > mind citing a lawyer's medical opinion when it "fits you view of the > > case," again your term not mine. > > > > The people who wrote those journal articles are at least physicians, > > no? Definitely highly trained? > > > > Personally I think that you can approach this case on a number of > > levels -- legal, medical, ethical, emotional, and maybe some more that > > don't come to mind right now. A lot of the headbutting going on, imho, > > is a result of people not defining their frame of reference. Gruss for > > example is stuck on law. You *were* doing science; right now I am not > > sure. Sam I think is talking ethics. > > > > Dana > > > > > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:30:01 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Dana wrote: > > > > but is he a trained neurologist, Larry? > > > > > > > > > > Are you? > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151350 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
