> Robert wrote: 
> The Democrats pooh-poohed the whole notion of Sandy Berger being a thief 
> as ridiculous. Well, it turns out the press was right:
> 

Here's my off-the-top-of-my-head Op-Ed.  My point is, I think it's
time to start solving problems but to do that we'll have to remove the
money from politics.

Polarization - It ain't just for Penguins
-------------------------------------------------------------
"Polarization" has become a popular word when discussing politics
these days.  So why is it that we're so polarized all of a sudden? 
Because modern American politics has become like Amway.

Companies such as Amway are examples of "network" or "multi-level"
marketing and they offer anyone the chance join and "get rich". They
align themselves with all types of products and/or services like
Primerica for financial planning and Excel Telecommunications for long
distance service.

To some degree they all work the same way: a friend, acquaintance, or
ad offers you the ability to run your own small business by selling
products on your off-time.  You'll quickly become a millionaire since,
due to low overhead, the product is an exceptional deal.

If you dig deeper you find out there's a small catch: to start your
business you have to pay an up front fee for "training materials" or
"advertising" which is usually a few hundred dollars.  Then you find
out that you can quickly make that money back by simply finding a few
friends to join since you'll get a cut of their upfront fee.  Even
better, if your friends get their friends to join you get a cut of
THIER fee.  And so on, and so on, and so on.

Anybody who's paying attention quickly realizes that to make the real
money you don't sell the products, you just sign up friends and
encourage them to get their friends to sign up.

These multi-level marketing companies are, in fact, just Ponzi schemes
operating under the guise of product sales to stay legal.  Which
brings us back to politics.

Modern American politics has become a collection of special interests
operating for profit under the guise of fixing social problems.  And
the profits aren't just for special interests anymore.  Growing levels
of professions have begun to figure out that they too can profit by
aligning themselves with one side or another.

For example, it used to be implicit that when you claimed to be
reporting news you were also claiming to be a journalist, and when you
claimed to be a journalist you were claiming to be objective.  No
longer.

In February The National Press Foundation honored Fox News' Brit Hume
with its Sol Taishoff award.  The 4 person committee that unamimously
elected him called him, "an excellent journalist."  The trouble is
that Mr. Hume isn't objective and was said to practice "ideologically
connected journalism" by Geneva Overholser, the former ombudsman of
The Washington Post.

Isn't "ideologically connected journalism" an oxymoron?  I guess not. 
Of course Mr. Hume would claim he's only "balancing" the tilt of other
media outlets.

Here's the key: what he wouldn't say was that he was being objective. 
Why not?  Because that's less profitable.  Why?  Because millions of
people are also profiting by attaching themselves to his political
party and they want to hear what their side has to say; both to gather
their talking points and to justify their behavior.

They've figured out that when you align yourself with a party you get
favors, attention, and profit.  And the politicians at the root of it
have to pretend to be solving social issues to keep this Ponzi scheme
legal.  Just like Amway.

So why all of the polarization?  Because increasingly it's the only
way to make money in America.  Don't be surprised if during your next
job interview or client meeting they ask you which news channel you
watch.  But then you'll probably know just how to answer.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152533
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to