Ken Ketsdever wrote: > I would like to know the nature of the documents. It seems funny the > Republicans aren't making an issue of this.
These documents were draft versions of anti-terrorism plans. The drafts themselves are preserved in other copies, but the stolen copies had handwritten notes from government staffers, and are thus irreplaceable. Inadvertently mixing them up with other documents in your briefcase might be understandable. Hiding them in your clothes is less likely inadvertent. Bringing these handwritten national archives home with you and cutting them up with scissors seems quite deliberate. (Google News search term: berger scissors.) (For Republican strategy I have no idea, but I've seen that they often don't publicize such faults, probably for backstage leverage.) Try memeorandum.com for more perspective on the Berger story. jd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152552 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
