> > Which means that it just comes down to game play of individual games > etc. There are a lot of games either already or in the pipeline for all > three so I'd probably go for the x-box, hoping that because it has the > best spec it will be the last of the three to be obsolete. >
Interesting choice... :^) I think one of the biggest selling points of the PSX2, apart from the success of the PSOne, was that it was backwards compatible. Nintendo have never provided this, and I wonder whether MS would offer this in the future, knowing there lust for money, I suspect not... I feel pretty comfortable expecting that most of my PSX2 games would have a good chance of working on the PSX3. MS's history alone makes me very dubious about the xbox. It may have a wonderful spec, but what sort of conditions are MS putting on the game developers? I hope it's not similar to the infamous browser/os conditions put upon the PC suppliers!! Also, MS have a habit of not respecting customers when it comes to changes, upgrades, dropping of products etc... so can you be certain that an investment in xbox is a wise investment?? Why not just stick with a PC?? N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
