I agree that this episode has hurt US intelligence interests, but underlying 
this whole story is the ugly business that has gone on at the CIA in the last 
four years. Unelected officials at the agency have been playing politics, 
leaking information in deliberate attempts to sabotage Administration policy. 
They should have fully expected that if their people engaged in partisan 
battles that something like this would happen. It doesn't justify the leak, but 
it should illustrate the foolishness of having CIA agents and officials engaged 
in these sorts of partisan battles.

And let's not forget ethics. None of this affair would have ever happened had 
Valerie Plame simply observed Government Ethics 101- you don't use your 
position in government to influence purchasing decisions in favor of a spouse 
or other relative. But she didn't do that, she actively promoted the idea of 
using her husband for the Niger trip. 

Maybe the two of them assumed that her secret status would prevent the 
Administration from bringing up this issue of her ethical lapse. If so, that 
suggests a "dirty tricks" campaign by the Wilsons to discredit the 
Administration and use her CIA status as a shield to prevent the Administration 
from talking about it. All of which goes back to my original point. Joe Wilson 
was hired by the CIA to do a job. He should have done his job and kept his 
mouth shut, but he (and others at the CIA) just had to get involved in the 
partisan battles in Washington over the war. You know the old saying- it takes 
two to tango.

If you ask me, this whole nasty affair illustrates, yet again, the staggering 
incompetence of the CIA in carrying out its mission, as well as the dirty 
business of partisan politics in Washington today.

If it were up to me, the prosecutor would find and jail the person responsible 
for the leak, and he would jail Plame on ethics violations and Wilson for 
opening his big lying mouth and injecting himself into a partisan debate after 
he was paid to render a service to the Administration.


>If you knew you'd be killed for meeting with a US agent, would you
>feel comfortable doing so knowing the Whitehouse had exposed one for
>political reasons?  I sure as hell wouldn't.
>
>Thus the massive damage to US intelligence gathering and therefore
>national security.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Purchase Studio MX with Flash Pro from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized 
Affiliate and support the CF community.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=51

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:166441
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to