> Sam wrote: > And aren't you the guy that thinks laws should only be referenced when > they suit your wants?
No, I'm the guy who thinks laws should be few and clear with a goal to err on the side of personal freedoms. 1.) On the Schiavo case, I was eager to see Mr. Schiavo's moral rights protected be they the letter of the law or no. I consider those rights to be privacy and the right to make medical decisions for his family without the federal gov't stepping in. 2.) On the Plame case, I'm eager to see Mr. Bush do the right thing be it the letter of the law or not. Unfortunately he's not going to do that so we'll have to resort to the law. As a libertarian I'm not surprised to see negligence and abuse-of-power from the gov't. Now, when you reply, if you reply, try to reply with something useful rather than your usual "Clinton sucks" posts. He's not President anymore. Catch up. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:166587 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
