You telling me faith isn't needed to explain science? I'm sure as hell relying on faith every time I board and airplane. Sure I know the science behind it, air beneath the wing is denser than the air above it.
We must rely on faith, because we certainly don't know for sure. We have a pretty good idea, but what is to say there isn't something that can change those rules? What if tomorrow gravity was just a bit stronger? What if the world started to spin faster? -----Original Message----- From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:34 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Bush wants religion taught in the science classroom > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:25 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Bush wants religion taught in the science classroom > > Jim, there is a very simple argument that while I don't agree with, is > almost impossible for science to argue with. > > Faith. Science doesn't want to argue with faith at all. Nor do it. However neither of us wants to see it taught in the science classroom. The instant "faith" is needed to explain any phenomenon you've left the realms of science. To be clear however I am still just talking about the science curricula. There is definitely room for faith in other aspects of teaching and, undoubtedly, in the science student. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:167724 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
