That I agree with and I don't have an answer. I guess my point was Bush isn't attacking gays for religious purposes, the gays are pushing for change and the people aren't read for it. The President is just supporting the people on this issue.
On 9/9/05, Ian Skinner wrote: > Ok lets be equal. Let us not call any of them marriages. Everybody gets a > "Civil Union?" This has been shot down by opponents to gay marriage. Why, > it not a marriage anymore? > > In my mind the sensible, solution is that the government document that > confers the civil rights of a joining of two people is a "Civil Union" > license. And that should be all that is required in the eyes of the state. > No ceremony necessary. Then a "Marriage" is the ceremony that the couple > (group) can have with the affiliation of their choice. This confers no state > recognized rights, but anybody can have them. So a couple (group) can either > get a Civil Union License, have a Marriage ceremony or both as they see fit. > > But for some reason a sensible compromise like this is not acceptable to > many, usually conservative/christen, people. Anybody care to speculate why? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:173628 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
