> Matthew wrote: > Therefore, shouldn't pro-choice be much more into preventing the pregnancy > than in terminating it? >
Well everyone that's willing to do something to stop abortion should be putting all their efforts into stopping the root cause, unwanted pregnancy. However you can't avoid it yet so you also have to come up with a way to deal with unwanted pregnancies. > "The "pro-choicers" choose to treat the root cause, unwanted pregnancy." > Nope, the pregnancy has already occurred. Pro-choicers are treating the > problem "Unwanted Baby". There's a big difference there. > Well, to my knowledge, groups such as Planned Parenthood provide education and birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancies thus the "planned" part of their name. > Agreed. How about birth control in the water? > Hey, that was my idea! Even though it violates every one of my other principles I say do it and then a couple has to get a license to have a baby. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:174453 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
