I think the differences her is that you're raising purely philosophical points, I'm suggesting more empirical ones. In other words, its testable and the data is available, why not see what the results say.
larry On 10/3/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Larry wrote: > > Not a valid comparison. Single case design studies are like group > > experimental designs turned on their head > > This is an issue of human nature or we wouldn't be talking about it. > Everyone would've made the right decisions when they were young and > would have the drive and motivation to *earn* a "living wage". > > Here's the deal, I think building governmental costs into the economy > for, say, environmental concerns, is perfectly fine; As Adam Smith > says, "waste impoverishes us all." > > However this is a cost that has no reward. It doesn't improve > productivity or efficiency, or preserve resources. It simply tricks > people by telling them they have marketable skills when they really > don't. How is that good for them? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175735 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
