> Matthew wrote: > Gruss, you're hopelessly in love with your argument to the point where you > don't know what it says. >
I agree with the former, but not the latter since what I'm saying is quite simple. If we're trying to solve the problem of "working poor", there are essentially 2 proposals in this thread: 1.) Give the working poor a subsidy that the market does not demand in exchange for doing the same thing they've always done, or 2.) Give the poor the infrastructure to raise their own pay by raising their marketable skills and thus no longer depending on the government subsidies. My argument is that #2 is superior as it weens the working poor off gov't assistance. That is, it teaches them to live independent of government subsidies rather than depend on them. That's pretty simple and direct. Which of these solutions do you favor? Or maybe you have other proposals? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:175798 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
