> Dana wrote: > but nothing there > supports the label of "fake journalistic propaganda" either. >
I dunno about that - it's weakly sourced (if it is), and there're things like this: "At a recent White House strategy session, internal party pollsters told the President that his approval rating with Americans continues to slide and may be irreversible" I just don't see that happening. Did the President really attend a meeting where his team said, "ah, yup, you're hosed. Nothing we can do. Well, see ya." I doubt it. I guess I would call if fake journalistic, but not quite propaganda. That being said, it's probably like the National Enquirer: it doesn't always have facts, but the trend is right. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase RoboHelp from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=59 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:179984 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
