On 11/5/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dana wrote: > > but nothing there > > supports the label of "fake journalistic propaganda" either. > > > > I dunno about that - it's weakly sourced (if it is), and there're > things like this: > > "At a recent White House strategy session, internal party pollsters > told the President that his approval rating with Americans continues > to slide and may be irreversible" > > I just don't see that happening. Did the President really attend a > meeting where his team said, "ah, yup, you're hosed. Nothing we can > do. Well, see ya." I doubt it. I guess I would call if fake > journalistic, but not quite propaganda. > > That being said, it's probably like the National Enquirer: it doesn't > always have facts, but the trend is right. > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:179986 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
