> I'll try again. The way our society understands marriage is between a > man and a women. That's the way nature intended.
WRONG! All nature decided was whether two people can produce a child or not. Two women can't, two men can't, a man and a barren women can't...etc. Nature has NO intention towards marriage....it can't! Marriage a purely human invention. YOU are the one deciding that nature's intentions towards child conception reveal an intention towards your creation of marriage. > If a couple can't > have a child and adopt of use a test tube they're still doing what > nature intended, they just have a handicap or a good heart. > What I'm hearing now is people wanting it to be accepted that nature > intended gay marriage just as readily as heterosexual. I'm just saying > it's acceptable but not what nature intended. You know the whole > evolution thing. The only thing natured intended was that two men couldn't have sex and conceive a child. That's it. No mention of "marriage" there...... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Studio MX from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=50 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180715 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
