think about it a little more :) On 11/9/05, G wrote: > > I'll try again. The way our society understands marriage is between a > > man and a women. That's the way nature intended. > > WRONG! All nature decided was whether two people can produce a child or > not. Two women can't, two men can't, a man and a barren women can't...etc. > > Nature has NO intention towards marriage....it can't! Marriage a purely > human invention. YOU are the one deciding that nature's intentions towards > child conception reveal an intention towards your creation of marriage. > > > If a couple can't > > have a child and adopt of use a test tube they're still doing what > > nature intended, they just have a handicap or a good heart. > > What I'm hearing now is people wanting it to be accepted that nature > > intended gay marriage just as readily as heterosexual. I'm just saying > > it's acceptable but not what nature intended. You know the whole > > evolution thing. > > The only thing natured intended was that two men couldn't have sex and > conceive a child. That's it. No mention of "marriage" there...... >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180724 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
