> Sam wrote: > If only he was as smart as you. For weeks you've been claiming Rove is > 99% guilty and if not him it was Libby. At least he's involved so he > has a qualified opinion. Unlike some Kool-Aid drinker that thinks he > knows-it-all :) >
You so consistently misrepresent my point of view it's clear that you've got some type of reading comprehension problem. This must also contribute to your loony responses. I'll try it once more and then I'm done: 1.) According the CIA Ms. Plame was an undercover agent. 2.) Somehow her name was leaked to the press by the administration. This is confirmed by Mr. Woodward's revelation that he was the original leakee. Put another way to make sure you get it, Mr. Woodward is saying that the first leak of Ms. Plame's identity was to him from an official other than Mr. Libby. That is, the Whitehouse leaked the name of an undercover agent to the press. 3.) The Whitehouse denied that either Rove of Libby had anything to do with the case. That is clearly a lie. Further, when Mr. McClellan admitted as much, the Whitehouse actually changed the transcript of what he said despite the fact that it was caught on video. Your assertion that "no crime was committed" is a complete denial of the facts. If you have some reasonable point, make it, but 99% of the time you don't. Your posts here continue that trend. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:182568 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
