you aren't getting the protect your source thing. It's an imperative for a political reporter, especially at that level. And he was not covering up because afaik nobody asked him. Once it became clear that there was going to be a trial the ethics were a little different I think.
Dana > was no merit to the charge, why didn't he come forward immediately? > > It's as if he covered up the information on the one hand, but on the > other was downplaying the merits of the case. > > Either way he seems dishonest. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:183101 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
