Do you have any experience with or knowledge of standard military equipment and procedures outside of what you read in the press? I recommend asking military personnel how common incendiary grenades are before deciding whether using them is unusual and improper. We have a few vets on the list you could ask.
Of course the US and British "admitted" to using them if it's standard ordinance. Duh! This whole story from the beginning has smelled like bad propaganda to sway the uninformed. Remember, war sucks. It's crappy, nasty and ugly. It is, at its core, about killing people to achieve a goal. Next we're going to be complaining that the US is shooting people with real bullets and require a lawyers signature before each round is shot. Bah. On 11/21/05, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The US and British admitted it so it's not bs. > > Their position, depending on who you talk to, seems to be either > > 1- It was not used against civilians > or > 2- A little confused on the lawyer answer but it is either that we did > not sign the treaty that bans it or it may not qualify as a WMD under > the treaty. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:183506 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
