This is the irony though. They're earmarking funds on a non-renewable
resource that is being quickly depleted. It's a system that's barely
equitable and doomed to failure.

On 11/27/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And when you consider the reasoning it makes perfect sense. If we are
> going to construct and improve roads with the Gas tax, cars that consume
> less gas should pay more taxes.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:184187
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to