What about the phrase A well regulated militia, being necessary to the
security of a free state?

isn't that important?

On 12/19/05, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry,
>
> Why is it in every other reference to "the people" it means individual
> citizens.  But in this case, you think "the people" refers to the state
> government.
>
>
> And I'm curious?  Do you think we should ban all guns in the US?
>
> How do we go about collecting all the unregistered firearms in this country?
>
> Regulation is the best route here.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 8:59 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Iran
>
> Lets parse the amendment shall we:
>
> "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,"
>
> Clearly refers to a non-federal military arm. The remaining parts of
> the amendment are subordinate.
>
> As for your example its irrelevant. I'll give you a better one, what
> would you do if the Bush administration began freely violating US law
> authorizing actions against US citizens multiple times.
>
> Are you willing to actively resist that? I've noticed that you've been
> very quiet about this issue:
>
> "President Bush acknowledged Saturday that since October 2001 he has
> authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on international
> phone calls and e-mails of people within the United States without
> seeking warrants from courts."
>
>
>
> On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whether you or anybody else believes it, I do happen to beleive that the
> > right of the person to keep and bear arms in order to protect themselves
> > from a governement run amok.  What would you do if the the Bush
> > Administration shut down the border and started executing Canadians?  You
> > should have the right to bear arms, .50 cal included.  Should it be
> > regulated?  Yes, I do believe it should be registered,but not infringed
> > upon. I'm not even a gun owner not a member of the NRA, which I do believe
> > is a fringe group, but I realize that weapons are the reason there is a US
> > today, and the right to bear arms is as important as the right to free
> > speech.
> >
> > - Matt
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:22 AM
> > Subject: Re: Iran
> >
> >
> > > The phrase "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security
> > > of a free state," is frequently and most conviently forgotten about in
> > > the pro gun lobby's propaganda effort. The full amendment is "A well
> > > regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
> > > the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be
> > > infringed."
> > >
> > > The common legal consensus, and one that the SCOTUS has followed for
> > > over a century now is that the second amendment mainly refers to
> > > protections afforded the individual states regarding the establishment
> > > of reserves and the National Guard, and not to allow any drooling
> > > idiot the right to purchase a 50 cal. machine gun.
> > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> What are you talking about?
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:14 AM
> > >> Subject: Re: Iran
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > how about the entire 2nd amendment, and not the edited version that
> > >> > the NRA propaganda machine keeps spouting.
> > >> >
> > >> > larry
> > >> >
> > >> > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> So I guess this brings up the 2nd Amendment.  Are you for/against
> it,
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> why?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> - Matt
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> >> From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> >> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
> > >> >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:07 AM
> > >> >> Subject: Re: Iran
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Ugh. That's disgusting.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> >> http://www.gac.20m.com/self-def.htm
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> - Matt
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188710
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to