No,

You would need a constitutional amendment. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
> 
> If I pass a law claiming I don't need a warrant to do the 
> search then doesn't that satisfy the requirement there?
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:55 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
> > 
> > 4th Amendment - Due Process of Law.  Guards against 
> unlawful search and
> > seizure, quarting of soldiers, etc.   I believe this is 
> what applies.
> > 
> > - Matt
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned
> > 
> > 
> > > Where in the constitution does it say they can't?
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189134
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to