The order doesn't say that a search couldn't be made of a citizens home to find this info. Why would the attorney general be given the power to order this unless it was going to be used in the US?
Clinton officials argued in front of congress that this order and one signed by Regan gave them the authority to do this. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:00 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > OK, > > Two major things from the Clinton Executive Order jumped out at me. > > 1. The word foreign used over and over again. Meaning not within the US, > and not against American citizens. Even if it's domestic, against > non-citizens I don't have a problem with it. > > 2. With the cooperation and consent of the Senate. While a few (very few) > senators were briefed in on this operation, not very many were, and they > were really given no oversight. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189135 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
