oh man. So according to you it's just a bureaucratic checklist? On 12/21/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The 4th Amendment doesn't claim that a warrant is needed to perform the > search, only the means to obtain one. > > I would think that should congress pass a law allowing it, then the search > is in the eyes of the Constitution and the Supreme Court. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 2:02 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > > > um check me on this please Tim... didn't there used to be something > called > > the fourth amendment? I think? Something about unreasonable search? > > Something that said that if I am minding my own business having a chat > > about > > politics with some people I know, it's none of the government's > business? > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189154 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
