> Dana wrote: > ok. So if you are correct about that it would seem that Clinton may have > violated the civil liberties of one person whom he correctly suspected of > being a spy.
I don't even understand the point in the first place! Isn't this kind of like catching your spouse boinking somebody else and having them tell you that it's ok because they've been doing it for years? Bush, Clinton, Carter, NSA, FBI, etc. are all members of the set called government. Either we think government should be violating our privacy or we don't. Who the violators are or were is totally irrelevant. If they violated my privacy I want it stopped and I want the violators prosecuted no matter who they are. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Studio MX from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=50 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189489 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
