you really want to do a line by line reading of the Patriot Act? On 12/22/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My point being that I disagree with your opinion that this is in violation > of the 4th Amendment. > > My point has always been that the 4th Amendment doesn't require a warrant, > and allows searches and seizures so long as they have been deemed > reasonable. And that should Congress pass a law that clearly gives law > enforcement a certain power, then how could you argue that the search is > unreasonable. > > First you must find something in the law that is specifically forbidden by > the Constitution. No where does the constitution claim that a warrant is > needed, it does claim what is needed to obtain a warrant, but in my > opinion > it gives officers the ability to act when there may not be enough time to > acquire a warrant. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:37 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > > > ok. So if you are correct about that it would seem that Clinton may have > > violated the civil liberties of one person whom he correctly suspected > of > > being a spy. Can we let go of that and take a look at the wholesale > > violations of the fourth amendment that seem to currently be taking > place? > > > > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189497 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
