I actually doubt that Nick is right about that. But if in fact there is an enemy agent out there I reallly don't have a problem with expediting procedures as long as there is at some point review and recourse in a court of law.
But you're right in saying that this is a variation on the Clinton did it too argument. On 12/22/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dana wrote: > > ok. So if you are correct about that it would seem that Clinton may have > > violated the civil liberties of one person whom he correctly suspected > of > > being a spy. > > I don't even understand the point in the first place! > > Isn't this kind of like catching your spouse boinking somebody else > and having them tell you that it's ok because they've been doing it > for years? > > Bush, Clinton, Carter, NSA, FBI, etc. are all members of the set > called government. Either we think government should be violating our > privacy or we don't. > > Who the violators are or were is totally irrelevant. If they violated > my privacy I want it stopped and I want the violators prosecuted no > matter who they are. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189498 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
