If you want to sure. Do you have specific items that are explicitly denied by the Constitution or any treaties that have been signed.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:57 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: [politics] nobody else seems to be concerned > > you really want to do a line by line reading of the Patriot Act? > > On 12/22/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My point being that I disagree with your opinion that this is in > violation > > of the 4th Amendment. > > > > My point has always been that the 4th Amendment doesn't require a > warrant, > > and allows searches and seizures so long as they have been deemed > > reasonable. And that should Congress pass a law that clearly gives law > > enforcement a certain power, then how could you argue that the search is > > unreasonable. > > > > First you must find something in the law that is specifically forbidden > by > > the Constitution. No where does the constitution claim that a warrant is > > needed, it does claim what is needed to obtain a warrant, but in my > > opinion > > it gives officers the ability to act when there may not be enough time > to > > acquire a warrant. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| All-in-one: antivirus, antispam, firewall for your PC and PDA. Buy Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=60 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189504 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
