I'll admit that I don't know anything about Washington sate or Oregon.  I
have however lived in Maine, and I have family there still.  The entire
state is a mess.  They are taxed to hell and back, their economy is in
ruins, there are almost no jobs other than seasonal work.  I hope you
wouldn't want to point to Maine as your example.

Plus Maine has very loose CCW laws and is a class 3 (machine gun legal)
state.

You sure we're talking about the same place man?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:59 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: US Propganda against Chavez stretches into Media
> 
> No, it sbeing done in places like Maine, Washington state, Oregon etc.
> 
> It is incompatible with the ideals of the right wing however.
> 
> larry
> 
> On 1/6/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Right but aren't your ideals essentially incompatible with 
> our form of 
> > government and our constitution?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:27 AM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: Re: US Propganda against Chavez stretches into Media
> > >
> > > In your definitions.
> > >
> > > I support appropriately sized government. I idea is that 
> government 
> > > should do the needed stuff that the private sector is not 
> willing or 
> > > cannot do. This includes education, health care, defense, 
> economic 
> > > development and so on. I think that a rational approach that 
> > > emphasizes what works rather than what is politically 
> expedient is 
> > > more appropriate. Look at what has been shown to work, if 
> necessary 
> > > set up experiments and see what works best.
> > >
> > > I take a very historical and an international perspective on 
> > > government and democracy. Just like the communist nations 
> went too 
> > > far to the collectivist side, I think that the US is 
> moving too far 
> > > to the individualist side.
> > >
> > > Besides if you're buying the beer, I'll be drinking it.
> > >
> > > larry
> > >
> > > On 1/6/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm not trying to suppress your free speech friend, I just
> > > can't see
> > > > why you would want to come here, knowing the history of 
> the United 
> > > > States, knowing your politics, and knowing what you believe.
> > > >
> > > > You've made it clear, at least to me, that you support bigger, 
> > > > more intrusive government, over the rights of the individual.
> > > From those
> > > > with ability to those without.  The rights of the many over
> > > the rights
> > > > of the few (or the individual).  We're on opposite side
> > > man.  We know that.
> > > >
> > > > Why take it personally?  You know we can still chill and
> > > drink a beer
> > > > :)  It just bugs me that we are importing liberals, and giving 
> > > > them the right to vote.  You know that.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:45 AM
> > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > Subject: Re: US Propganda against Chavez stretches into Media
> > > > >
> > > > > And your point is?
> > > > >
> > > > > Because I can see some good done in a country that 
> was a slimy 
> > > > > corrupt pesthole of the US's making before the revolution
> > > that means
> > > > > I cannot speak my mind? Aren't you trying to  do the 
> same as the 
> > > > > Castro regime does - suppress free speech?
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember that the Baptista regime that was in power 
> before the 
> > > > > revolution was far worse than the current government. It
> > > was in the
> > > > > pocket of American corporations and US based organized crime.
> > > > >
> > > > > When I see good I'll speak out, when I see stupidity I shall 
> > > > > also speak out. The current policy of the US government
> > > towards Cuba is
> > > > > stupid, hypicritical and counter productive.
> > > > > If it had used the same approach as it did with the 
> Soviets, the 
> > > > > Castro regime would have suffered the same fate. The current 
> > > > > policies play right into the hands of the Castro
> > > government. In one
> > > > > sense these policies make the US the best ally that 
> the Castro 
> > > > > dictatorship can have - an outside enemy that 
> everything can be 
> > > > > blamed on.
> > > > >
> > > > > larry
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/6/06, Tim Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > This is ok with you, at the expense of freedom of
> > > speech, at the
> > > > > > expense of liberty?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jesus.  You're going to be a citizen of the United States?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:12 AM
> > > > > > > To: CF-Community
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: US Propganda against Chavez stretches into 
> > > > > > > Media
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Given that the country has a higher literacy rate, fewer
> > > > > poor people
> > > > > > > with better health care, and a considerably lower infant
> > > > > death rate
> > > > > > > than any other country in the region, I would say
> > > that that is a
> > > > > > > fairly good definition of national success. BTW 
> that infant 
> > > > > > > death rate is considerably lower than the US
> > > according to the WHO.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > larry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 1/6/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Perhaps he respects Castro for standing up to US
> > > > > Aggression and
> > > > > > > > > still being able to reduce poverty, provide excellent
> > > > > > > healthcare and
> > > > > > > > > all the other things he has managed to do in the
> > > face of US
> > > > > > > > > pressure.Maybe THAT is what he respects.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can't believe you are touting the success of
> > > Castro's Cuba.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So because you assume that based on US or Western 
> > > > > > > > > Society
> > > > > > > mankind is
> > > > > > > > > Greedy, therefore the only solution is a system that 
> > > > > > > > > rewards,exemplifies and promotes Greed above all else?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Um, in economics? Yes. The simple fact that you
> > > > > apparently fail to
> > > > > > > > grasp, is that capitalism works, and socialism doesn't.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What about the social services offered in Canada? Or
> > > > > > > Western Germany
> > > > > > > > > before the fall of the wall?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What about them?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:190839
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to