Hey Kevin, If you're so great in the biosciences then list the number of research articles that present empirical evidence that support ID in peer reviewed scientific journals.
How about 2 articles? One? I am sure that you will find not one from a credible journal that shows any support. On 1/11/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh...since when have public school science teachers had any training in > science. I mean c'mon, the science they make you take with an education > degree could be learned from watching Mr. Wizard on Sunday mornings. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:25 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: I'm gonna back Intelligent Design > > Its teaching the Christian religion in a public school class. It > wouldn't be so bad if they taught other creation theories. They ought > to include the Sumerian creation myth, one of the Polynesian myths > etc. > > But the problems lie in the fact that the teacher has no training in > science and if you read the description, its obvious that there is an > agenda - teaching Christianity on the public dime.: 'An initial course > description sent to parents in December said it would examine > "evolution as a theory and will discuss the scientific, biological and > Biblical aspects that suggest why Darwin's philosophy is not rock > solid."' > > Another iffy point is that there is no real lecture etc by the > teacher, the course is dependent on videos and guest lecturers. > 'Classes started two days later with a class plan that relied solely > on videos, not guest speakers. > [snip] > The Washington, D.C.-based Americans United for Separation of Church > and State said that with one exception the course "relies exclusively > on videos that advocate religious perspectives and present religious > theories as scientific ones.' > > So this course is not taking the most objective approach. > > larry > > > On 1/11/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I really am.....a California high school is getting sued for offering an > elective class about Intelligent Design. The class is presented as a > philosophy class centering on discussions about various philosophies > concerning the origin of man. The class is NOT presented as a science class, > and is NOT being required in the core curriculum. > > > > I think this is exactly where ID belongs...so I don't see the validity of > this law suit. How can you sue over an elective philosophy class that is > discussing philosophy...philisophically? > > > > Info here: > http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/01/11/evolution.debate.calif.ap/index.html > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:191771 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
