oh please. List me a teaching program that contains any serious science. If you are going to be nasty fine, but stick to the point.
Dana On 1/11/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Kevin, > > If you're so great in the biosciences then list the number of research > articles that present empirical evidence that support ID in peer > reviewed scientific journals. > > How about 2 articles? One? > > I am sure that you will find not one from a credible journal that > shows any support. > > On 1/11/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heh...since when have public school science teachers had any training in > > science. I mean c'mon, the science they make you take with an education > > degree could be learned from watching Mr. Wizard on Sunday mornings. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:25 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: I'm gonna back Intelligent Design > > > > Its teaching the Christian religion in a public school class. It > > wouldn't be so bad if they taught other creation theories. They ought > > to include the Sumerian creation myth, one of the Polynesian myths > > etc. > > > > But the problems lie in the fact that the teacher has no training in > > science and if you read the description, its obvious that there is an > > agenda - teaching Christianity on the public dime.: 'An initial course > > description sent to parents in December said it would examine > > "evolution as a theory and will discuss the scientific, biological and > > Biblical aspects that suggest why Darwin's philosophy is not rock > > solid."' > > > > Another iffy point is that there is no real lecture etc by the > > teacher, the course is dependent on videos and guest lecturers. > > 'Classes started two days later with a class plan that relied solely > > on videos, not guest speakers. > > [snip] > > The Washington, D.C.-based Americans United for Separation of Church > > and State said that with one exception the course "relies exclusively > > on videos that advocate religious perspectives and present religious > > theories as scientific ones.' > > > > So this course is not taking the most objective approach. > > > > larry > > > > > > On 1/11/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I really am.....a California high school is getting sued for offering an > > elective class about Intelligent Design. The class is presented as a > > philosophy class centering on discussions about various philosophies > > concerning the origin of man. The class is NOT presented as a science class, > > and is NOT being required in the core curriculum. > > > > > > I think this is exactly where ID belongs...so I don't see the validity of > > this law suit. How can you sue over an elective philosophy class that is > > discussing philosophy...philisophically? > > > > > > Info here: > > http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/01/11/evolution.debate.calif.ap/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:191861 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
