big ip5 On 1/18/06, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Biggest this I see with that configuration is no redundancy. > > If that is not an issue to you, then start with that and go > > from there. > > There will be limited redundancy, the web and intranet will each be backed > up onto the other server so should one fail I can play with some port > forwading and IP config and get one to do the job of both in the short term. > > > Money no object... I would but at least three web servers > > behind a load balancer. Have two DBs clustered. For course, > > This will require a load balancer, couple firewalls, some > > switches... but money is no object, right? > > ;-) > > Anyone got any recommendations on hardware load balancers? > > -- > Jay > > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192952 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
