The ones I have used... Radware WSD and Cisco Content Services Switch. IMO, Radware is better, but costs about twice as much. I am currently using Cisco's Content Services Switch and I have no problems with them. Since they are redundant, one can crash and we are still up. Cisco has the new one here with one day.
There are others out there, but I have not used them. -----Original Message----- From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:16 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Server configuration > Biggest this I see with that configuration is no redundancy. > If that is not an issue to you, then start with that and go > from there. There will be limited redundancy, the web and intranet will each be backed up onto the other server so should one fail I can play with some port forwading and IP config and get one to do the job of both in the short term. > Money no object... I would but at least three web servers > behind a load balancer. Have two DBs clustered. For course, > This will require a load balancer, couple firewalls, some > switches... but money is no object, right? > ;-) Anyone got any recommendations on hardware load balancers? -- Jay ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192954 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
