Cisco CSS
_____ From: James Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:16 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Server configuration > Biggest this I see with that configuration is no redundancy. > If that is not an issue to you, then start with that and go > from there. There will be limited redundancy, the web and intranet will each be backed up onto the other server so should one fail I can play with some port forwading and IP config and get one to do the job of both in the short term. > Money no object... I would but at least three web servers > behind a load balancer. Have two DBs clustered. For course, > This will require a load balancer, couple firewalls, some > switches... but money is no object, right? > ;-) Anyone got any recommendations on hardware load balancers? -- Jay ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192956 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
