You mean just like the NSA is wiretapping trecherous American
citizens, like several different Catholic groups.

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security,
deserve neither liberty or security."

On 1/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the problem? They aren't asking to identify people, just search
> patterns to determine if the child filters are working.
> This means children doing harmless searches that get tricked into
> going to porn sites that the filters miss. Whitehouse.com comes to
> mind.
> All the other search engines complied, Google decide to make a public
> fuss about it. What's really scary is what Google does know and store
> about there users.
>
>
> On 1/19/06, William Bowen wrote:
> > > So who wrote the subpoena?
> >
> > DOJ. Which is their job.
> >
> > But I think the really interesting part of this is that the Supreme
> > Court already struck this law down. So I guess El Presidente decided
> > that since he's got Alito coming on board he can get this another
> > go'round.
> >
> > Then when the unconstitutionality is questioned - again - his packed
> > court'll rubber stamp this idiocy.
> >
> > neat huh?
> >
> > I imagine there'll be a few more of these type cases coming in the
> > next couple years...the Oregon physician assisted suicide law recently
> > upheld will be an interesting case...
> >
> > I guess with Alito, he gets do-overs.
> >
> > will
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:193349
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to