> Dana wrote: > I'm several years out from macroeconomics, and it would take a lot of time > and checking
So, if I understand you, you're saying that: 1.) You don't understand the economics of your position well enough to summarize it. 2.) However you're confident that this should be the base of all governement entitlement/business policy and would solve many of the social problems we have. 3.) No executive administration or Congress since the 20s has understood Keynes as well as you, which explains why these social problems are still around. As for me, I don't need to read about Keynes, I know all about him. In case you didn't get this from my many posts, I don't agree with you. Further I'm asking you to use your Keynes to disprove what I've said and you haven't or can't. Yet you're telling me you've got it all figured out. Does that about sum it up? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194732 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
