> Based on the fact that in a previous thread you agreed with all my > points I would have to say no.
I should hope not. > > And yes, one of my friends who is a hindu has read the thread as well. > How is that relevant to finding out how Muslims view an article that > referred to their Religion? A devout Muslim may be more inclined to see bias in matters referring to their religion, than someone on the outside looking in. This would be true for ALL faiths. The Christian right here in America see's bias all over the place that to the detached observer is patently ridiculous. > > I think that the decision to publish the article, and the bigoted > commentary in the article is all the fault of the Dutch newspaper, yes > I do. Who's fault do you think it is that it was published? I think > that the article was inflammatory, bigoted, patently incorrect and > misrepresented Islam on the whole and it was obviously offensive. > Who's fault do you think that is? I don't think the paper should have printed the cartoons. > > Do you have any context for the publishing of that article in the > Danish newspaper as to the realities in Denmark with regards it's > Muslim minority and how they are treated? Nope, none whatsoever. They fired the guy responsible for publishing the cartoons though, so that tells me something was afoul. Perhaps the publishing was done out of some sort of spite. If that is the case, the newspaper should be apologizing left and right. > > Because the violence is not up for debate, that is wrong and the > criminals perpatrating those violent acts are wrong and no one is > debating that. Good. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196095 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
