1. I said I am angry. I'm not saying *we* are angry because on the whole 
*we*, i.e. most of the western world, has it's head in the sand and doesn't 
care what happens over 'there'.
2. *They* kill their own because they are angry with us. *They* act like 
total savages because they're angry with us. You think that this might be 
because of a problem *they* have and not one they have with us. You think 
that we're just an excuse?
We are an excuse. If it's not us, it's someone else. Something else. 
Anything but *their* responsibility. Anything but *their* fault. It's always 
someone else.


> is it possible that as we are angry about *them* they are angry about 
> *us*? It's so much easier to vilify someone who is not present. Safer, 
> too, if that's your point.
>
> Dana
>
>>I thikn Michael has a valid question about why there aren't ANY
>>protests in all the places we have been seeing protests about the
>>cartoons about a man blowing up women and children?
> insurgency.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196954
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to