No, it's a clarification of mine. You said I was angry. I agreed. Jerry said that I had a valid question concerning the lack of protests when people are killed vs. when a picture is drawn. Your response was to expand my being angry and say that maybe while *we're* angry at *them* (a new position not stated before), *they* are angry at *us* (a position that has nothing to do with *their* own murder of innocents). I.e. your response had nothing to do with his post, nothing to do with my post and nothing to do with the central issue brought up of innocent people murdered in Iraq by other Muslims (or even innocent people Murdered in Iraq at all). If it were American's who did the killing I'm sure there would be a whole different response.
> is that supposed to be a summary of my position? > >>1. I said I am angry. I'm not saying *we* are angry because on the whole >>*we*, i.e. most of the western world, has it's head in the sand and >>doesn't >>care what happens over 'there'. >>2. *They* kill their own because they are angry with us. *They* act like >>total savages because they're angry with us. You think that this might be >>because of a problem *they* have and not one they have with us. You think >>that we're just an excuse? >>We are an excuse. If it's not us, it's someone else. Something else. >>Anything but *their* responsibility. Anything but *their* fault. It's >>always >>someone else. >> >> >>> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196961 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
