> My point is that I don't care how many sources you toss out there, > this is a pretty new bit of news and till someone in a position of > legal authority chimes in, it's all just a bunch of hoo-haw. 1977 is new.
> It very well may be illegal, but unless missed something - everything > presented so far is opinion of various unqualified contributors and > not a legal opinion. That, you'll excuse me for saying, is a cop-out. If the law is spelled out and they are in violation of it, how is that an opinion? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198356 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
