No, because that business would inevitably be providing material support for Al Qaeda, and that would be a violation US law, whereas the DPW subsidiary would be operating only in US ports and under US guidelines- meaning no boycott of Israel. It is different than the Al Qaeda example because the act of sending profits back to DPW does not violate US law, whereas Jihad Ice Cream would be violating the law by sending funds back to Bin Laden, et. al.
>So if Al Queda sets up a separate subsidiary, staffed by Americans, that >operates only the US business and complies with all the relevant laws, none >of this would be a problem. >Jihad ice cream anyone? All legal. > >> Even assuming that's all true, if DPW creates a separate subsidiary, >> staffed by Americans, that operates only the US ports and complies with >> all of the relevant laws, none of this would be a problem. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198363 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
