On 2/28/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That, you'll excuse me for saying, is a cop-out. If the law is spelled out
> and they are in violation of it, how is that an opinion?

Because in my opinion, my speeding ticket should have been voided
because I was going the speed of traffic.  My opinion doesn't count -
and for better or worse, yours doesn't either.

All I am saying is that this is a very complex issue involving
international law (several of them).  It's very convenient to pick a
stance which supports your political and/or religious viewpoint and
gather all the documents you can to support it, declaring yourself
right, and all others wrong.

I am not copping out, nor am I choosing a side (for or against) and
declaring who's right.  I am admitting that this issue is too complex
and involves too much knowledge for which I am not an expert.  It
would be arrogant and ignorant for me to think that I am right and
there is no other valid legal viewpoint when I am very much not
informed and not an authority on the matter.

-Cameron

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198361
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to