You mean just like the fantasy that the Iraqi invasion would pay for itself and that the entire population would welcome the US forces. It would be worse than what currently is happening in iraq.
Don't know what you're smoking but I'd cut back on it. On 3/12/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I got this particular "fantasy" from an article on the current > situation where an Iranian woman pondered whether the US could just come > into their country for three days, remove the mullahs, and leave. Have you > read anything about Iran or do you just presume that the entire world hates > the US? The population is very pro-Western, pro-American. That doesn't mean > they would welcome an invasion, but I am not proposing an invasion. They > want to be rid of the mullahs. I am proposing something akin to what we did > in Panama to Noriega, which seems to have worked out rather well for the > people of Panama. > > On 3/12/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You don't have to overcome Iran militarily? > > That's so absurd it is beyond laughter. > > > > You think the people of Iran will ever side with, or ever support > > America in an attack on their country? Bull----. America will firmly > > be fighting the Iran military and the Iranian people in any attack. > > > > Where do you get these fantasies that the world so loves America that > > they would welcome the death and destruction of their country from > > Nuclear Fallout? > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199676 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
